Welcome!

By Tyler Bunker | HNRS490 | Advisor: Jeremy Cushman

Site Guide

This site is still under construction. Please read the section titled “Note” located at the end of this page for more details.

Welcome to the website for my WWU Honors capstone project! This website is home to a multimodal essay on embodied listening, a term which comes from rhetoric studies. Embodied listening is not so much a concept or analytical framework as it is a way of being in the world. Though the essay will cover it in much greater detail, embodied listening is, briefly, a continuous process of attending to the way your body interfaces with the world. In other words, embodied listening calls for you to constantly be aware and think about how your body is responding to the world—but doing so holistically, recognizing that touch, for example, is intimately related to how hearing works (think the vibrations from bass played through a car speaker). Essentially, I want to examine this in the context of our ever-more-digital world—can we still have a satisfying and complete embodied experience over the internet? But I’ll explain this all much more thoroughly in the essay itself.

Before that, I’d like to offer a brief overview of the organization and navigation of this site. Below are three buttons that will take you to three separate versions of my essay—a multimodal version, a podcast version, and a text-only transcript. Let me explain why these three options are here. Embodied listening, as a multimodal practice that “offers flexible listening strategies that account for diverse bodies instead of proposing that all listeners should (or can) listen in the same way” (Ceraso 35), necessitates that we attend to and recognize the vast multiplicity of kinds of listening that different bodies enact. While a medium like print text offers limited amounts of multimodality, a website such as this one allows for a much greater variety of possibilities. In this respect, limiting my essay to one modality would be a failure to take advantage of the unique generative opportunities afforded by the internet, and indeed presents an accessibility barrier in that it limits access to folks who might prefer or need to encounter material within a specific modality.

In presenting my essay, then, I chose to adopt a multimodal approach that interweaves text, audio, and video, because each modality offers unique benefits—something like a stage performance, for example, is captured differently on video versus when described with text. I decided to focus on this particular multimodal approach, however, because it is what best works with my embodied experience of the world. In additionally offering the essay in podcast and transcript form, I hope to highlight the fact that the multimodal approach to this essay might not work for everybody, for a whole host of reasons, ranging from lack of access to technology like speakers to requiring a screen reader (for which a transcript of a video might prove more helpful). All that being said, feel free to click on whichever link works best for you.

Links to Essay

Use the buttons below to navigate to the essay. The three options reflect three different modes of presentation: read the “Site Guide” section above the buttons for more information. If I had to choose one, I would recommend the “Multimodal” link.

Note

This website is still under construction. Currently, only the multimodal version of my essay is hosted here. Because of the rhetorical differences between different modes of presentation, producing audio and text versions requires particular care in order to best attend to the possibilities of each mode. In her 2007 TED talk, Evelyn Glennie, a world-renowned percussionist, details her process of listening and performing, highlighting the importance of not just translating sheet music into a performance but interpreting it. Presenting content in different modes like I’m doing here works in the same way—a one-to-one translation from one format to another ignores the capacious potentialities of difference: an audio-based podcast, for example, might include sound effects or a backing track in order to evoke a particular mood that aligns with the story being told; on the other hand, a textual transcription could provide further interpretive insight in the respect that any videos or audio pieces cited are described with words in a way that highlights particular details that are most salient for the essay at hand. 

However, in aim of pursuing the continuous self-reflexivity that embodied listening (the focus of this essay) requires, I would like to expand on Glennie’s notions of interpretation and translation a bit further. In her TED talk, Glennie talks about how she understands her listening process vis-à-vis interpersonal relations: “in the same way that I need time with [my] instrument, I need time with people in order to interpret them. Not just translate them, but interpret them” (Glennie TED, 6:43-6:54). Recontextualizing this within the framework of my own project, interpreting my essay between different modes is a process that requires significant amounts of time—time which I failed to afford myself. While the multimodal format may work perfectly well for some folks, others who would experience the content in a more significant way through either audio- or text-only formats might find themselves unable to fully engage with this website in its present form. In writing this note, I’d like to apologize for the current state of the essay, in that only the multimodal version is currently online.